By John Pinkney
Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) programs, by design permit more control for those in search of aid to addressing their problems, which can allow for a faster resolution.
Litigants who are faced with business disputes, employment law cases, commercial litigation and other civil lawsuits often prefer the ADR procedure of mediation, as compared to nonbinding arbitration. When questioned for opinions on a court trial, respondents favored judge trials over trials by jury. Knowing this preference can assist the courts when looking to increase or persuade contribution in voluntary ADR dealings.
Consult a Coachella Valley Commercial Litigation Attorney to Learn More
Our Coachella Valley commercial litigation law firm offers numerous options for those active in civil litigation for resolution. A jury is not always required for a resolution; several lawsuits are settled annually via negotiations, sometimes with a contract drawn up by a neutral party, such as the arbiter.
The unorthodox route also has advantages. California has a large case backlog. It is possible for business litigation to be resolved faster with an ADR process such as mediation. These processes frequently permit for stronger involvement from the interested parties in the lawsuit.
Clearly, no single method is automatically best. Those involved may have to come to a preference to suit the specific circumstance. However, sometimes the only option for resolution comes from persuading a jury. Your situation may require a Coachella Valley business litigation law firm for resolution.
Regardless, a qualified legal representative is invaluable for guiding civil litigation to the best possible outcome. However, how this specific study’s findings can apply to any party’s case will rely upon the will of that party.